From: Wilson Fisk wilsonfisk2@yahoo.com
A photgraph of me in Paris is not the same thing as me being in Paris. Even if I look at the photograph of me in Paris whilst I am actuallty in Paris, the photpgraph is not the same as me being in Paris. >>
We are splitting hairs and arguing semantics.
No, I'm, using an anology, and a fairly striaghtforward one at that, to make my point.
I'm with the kingpin on this one. Pornography is not sex, it is a depiction of sex. Sex is not pornography, it is the acting out of the kind of behaviour depicted in pornography. Sexual acts may be performed in the production of pornography. Pornography may be referred to in the performance of sexual acts.
As differences go, this one is not so much a splitting of hairs as Bleeding Obvious.
Neil