At 10:11 PM 2/21/01 +0000, Fiona Moore wrote:
The reverse equivalent might be me going into a thread on red leather trousers and saying "That's intriguing. Have you considered deconstructing these trousers as a signifier of Lacanian potency, with regard to Derrida's belief that deconstruction cannot exist outside of the text?"
That'd be cool. So then maybe the Intellectual Giants go off on a pomo fashion tangent while the Nattering Nitwits continue trying to determine Avon's religion frame-by-frame...both directions (in my opinion) equally deserving of the header "Red Leather Trousers". Up with multipseudoculturalism!
A lot of people would flame me, and for good reason.
What is this good reason (assuming you don't have me killfiled yet, although I hope you do)? What do you consider the acceptable parameters of red trousers talk?
-- For A Dread Time, Call Penny: http://members.tripod.com/~Penny_Dreadful/