--- Helen Krummenacker avona@jps.net wrote:
I *like* non-dominant men. Better listeners,
more
respectful, more
supportive, not only compared to egotistical
men,
but also compared to
many females.
So men who aren't submissive are egotistical? I
prefer
an egalitarian relationship, myself-- neither partner dominant
*or*
submissive.
Non-dominant CAN mean equal, rather than submissive. You complain about others not thinking before they write, and then come up with this?
Excuse me, but I *was* thinking. The first post, which I quoted in full above, said "non-dominant men" were better than "egotistical men" which suggested to me that you saw men who were not non-dominant as egotistical. Guess we both misunderstood what the other meant.
And I agree with the rest of what you said.
Wendy
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/