9 Mar
2001
9 Mar
'01
10:49 a.m.
In message 3AA7D223.F92F393E@sdc.org, Betty Ragan ragan@sdc.org writes
Neil Faulkner wrote:
A slash interpretation isn't canon, but neither is an exclusively straight interpretation. Proofs are not required because the proofs aren't there. Either interpretation remains a speculation. At least if you make clear the basis for your speculation, one way or the other, you allow people to appreciate why you interpret it the way you do.
Actually, I all really want to say here is that I'm in fundamental agreement with pretty much everything you said in this entire post. Really.
AOL.
--
Julia Jones