Mistral wrote:
Nicola Mody-Nikoloff wrote:
In her avatar list, Judith mentions a western novel
("Darrow's Law") with
the two main characters called Darrow and Keating. I
actually read it out of
curiosity and it was pretty light-weight and forgettable,
but the sheriff
and his deputy were definitely Avon and Vila.
Either you're being very kind, or I'm simply too demanding. I went to the trouble and expense to order a copy of this from Amazon.co.uk and found it to be *the* most unreadable piece of pro-fic I've ever encountered. Nobody in this book *says* anything - they all snarl, or spit, or expostulate it - and the sentence rhythms are atrocious and grating. I tossed it away in disgust after only a cursory skim. Trying to salvage the expense, I loaned it to my dad, who goes through westerns the way some people go through chocolates, and even he couldn't finish it.
On the upside, after trying to read _Darrow's Law_, I was able to view my own fanfic with a somewhat less jaundiced eye. But consider this a plea for anyone who's interested in reading it to try to borrow it, or get it on interlibrary loan; don't waste your money. It is, IMO, beyond dreadful.
Yep, I was being kind. I hate to bad-mouth someone else's writing (maybe I'm scared of criticism myself), but I do wonder sometimes how some books get published.
Nico
*** This e-mail is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender. ***
Nicola Mody-Nikoloff wrote:
Yep, I was being kind. I hate to bad-mouth someone else's writing (maybe I'm scared of criticism myself), but I do wonder sometimes how some books get published.
I would be considerably gentler if we were talking about a beginner instead of a supposed pro; but I've come around to the opinion that when one put's one's art in the public eye, one had darn well better be able to take criticism. And that goes quadruple when one is expecting the audience to pay money for it. The arts need to be subject to peer review in order to maintain credibility, just as science is. I suppose I think that honesty is kinder to everybody in the long run. For one thing, there is no way for the artist to correct problems that s/he isn't aware of; for another, the public shouldn't have to suffer incompetence if they have a chance to avoid it by being told the truth.
Mistral