I was wondering if there's a clear consensus on command sets. What I mean
by that is, has everyone bought in on the idea of having named command sets
that are accepted or rejected during an initial command negotiation? If
it's felt to be not a good idea, fine; I feel that both Don and I have said
our piece. However, if you like it, then I have some comments on the draft.
Regards,
Alan
> I think it's a good idea to have a mechanism for extensions which is
> smart enough to allow a standard "not implemented" response.