Point very well taken - and one of which I am aware of. This is the appropriate forum for being up being up such issues. For simplistic and effectiveness, when I see consensus on an issue in this mailing list, I will document it and announce it. We may, of course, change it afterwards through discussion.
Is this a fair way of going about this?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gunnar Farnebäck" gunnar@lysator.liu.se To: gtp@lists.lysator.liu.se Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:23 PM Subject: Re: [gtp] End-of-line
Phil wrote:
In the specification, the end-of-line will be either a linefeed or carriage return. Empty lines are to be disregard and no output will be sent back.
You mean: "In my draft proposal for the specification, the end-of-line will be..."
Just to make things clear, I have no intention of delegating the decisions that needs to be made about the protocol. I do need input from other Go programmers to be able to make good decisions and I do need help with writing a useful standard text. Actually I could write it myself, but it would most likely take longer. Still that's the way I'll go if I have to.
/Gunnar _______________________________________________ gtp mailing list gtp@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/gtp