'the Pulitzer board vetoed the jury's recommendation, describing the novel as "unreadable", "turgid", "overwritten"'
The Pulitzer board is correct.
/Mark
On 2013-01-28 11:09, Mark Sulkowski wrote:
'the Pulitzer board vetoed the jury's recommendation, describing the novel as "unreadable", "turgid", "overwritten"'
The Pulitzer board is correct.
You guys realise that you're making me awfully curious, though? ;)
-j
mån 2013-01-28 klockan 11:11 +0100 skrev Johan Anglemark:
'the Pulitzer board vetoed the jury's recommendation, describing the novel as "unreadable", "turgid", "overwritten"'
The Pulitzer board is correct.
You guys realise that you're making me awfully curious, though? ;)
Read it and join us for the discussion! I can recommend at least the latter half of that sentence.
Hans
!!!!!
B-L
-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: lsff-bounces@lists.lysator.liu.se [mailto:lsff-bounces@lists.lysator.liu.se] För Mark Sulkowski Skickat: den 28 januari 2013 11:09 Till: lsff@lists.lysator.liu.se Ämne: Re: [LSFF] [Lsff-book] Doodle Gravity's Rainbow
'the Pulitzer board vetoed the jury's recommendation, describing the novel as "unreadable", "turgid", "overwritten"'
The Pulitzer board is correct.
/Mark _______________________________________________ lsff mailing list lsff@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/lsff
-
Hans Persson -
Johan Anglemark -
Mark Sulkowski -
Viklund Britt-Louise