In a message dated 2/26/01 1:23:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, Mac4781(a)aol.com
writes:
<< Those brief answers just might
indicate they don't want to be studied. Or as Sally very aptly put it-- "I
start feeling uncomfortable, a little like a lab rat who hasn't been asked
before the electrodes go in." >>
Yes, well, that was certainly *my* immediate thought in response to Fiona's
statements. Uh, maybe I don't want to be studied, especially in such a
manner. Maybe I also don't want to have my motives for liking certain types
of fan fiction examined and I certainly don't particularly care to be *told*
why I like something and what that something "is" (in complete disagreement
to my own stated preferences and what *I* believe that something "is").
This is, in fact, the crux of the problem many fans had with Camille
Bacon-Smith and Henry Jenkins' books about fandom. Many fans were highly
offended that they had been part of some sort of "study." Personally, I have
never had a problem with either book or either author... but, then, both
authors had spoken directly to both Leah and myself and I remember even
signing a release with one of them. So, we *did* know what they were up to.
Apparently, there were a good number of fans who didn't know and didn't take
kindly to be the basis of someone's academic lab experiment.
Annie