Annie wrote, and several others have put similar views:
>Maybe I also don't want to have my motives for liking certain
>types of fan fiction examined and I certainly don't particularly
>care to be *told* why I like something and what that something
>"is" (in complete disagreement to my own stated preferences
>and what *I* believe that something "is").
My immediate thoughts on this thread were along the lines of analytical 
types (such as myself) simply can't help analysing things, it is our 
natural way of working. Speaking as such a type, I would consider the main 
difficulty comes when it comes over as if one is analysing a trait one 
considers inferior in some fashion (whether or not this is actually in the 
minds of those doing the analysing).
However, although I'm a great analyser and categoriser of most things, I 
personally find such systems don't work well for complex items, such as 
fanfic (or people). In particular, and I know I'm in a minority here, I 
dislike the categorisation of fanfic into subgenres such as h/c. It seems 
to me that if one can accurately pigeonhole a piece of fiction into 
something relatively tightly defined, such as h/c, then the story must be 
unoriginal. Or, to put it another way, if I like a story, then I tend to 
like it for what is different from other stories that I've read, not what 
is similar (or identical).
I also agree that being a lab rat isn't very comfortable.
Tavia